Seth Thomas Pocket Watch: Serial Number 606133 (Grade 106)

Save to My Collection Print Page Find a Mainspring Find a Balance Staff

Similar Watches For Sale

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Seth Thomas, 18s, 11J, grade 106, mov#713725 Pocket Watch [Not working]

Check Price Source: eBay.com

Information Provided by PocketWatchDatabase.com:
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/seth-thomas/606133

Access Date: October 31, 2024

From the American Horology Archive:

Seth Thomas Watch Co.

Grade: 106

Private Label(s) in Run:

Montgomery Ward & Co. - Chicago - 20th Century

What is a Private Label?

Manufacturer:	Seth Thomas
Manufacturer Location:	Thomaston, Connecticut
Movement Serial Number:	606133
Grade:	106
Model:	6
Estimated Production Year:	1899
Run Quantity:	3,000
Grade/Model Run:	3 of 10
Grade/Model Total Production:	14,400
Size:	18s
Jewels:	11j
Jewel Setting:	Screw-Set
Movement Configuration:	Openface
Movement Finish:	Two-Tone
Finish Pattern:	Solid Circle
Movement Setting:	Lever
Plate:	3/4 Plate
Regulator:	Plain
Hairspring:	Breguet
Adjusted:	No
Railroad Grade:	No
Movement Markings:	Seth Thomas Thomaston, Conn. Safety Pinion
Case:	Various
Run ID:	781.106G3.18S662.186M30.O451.L689.11J78
Data Research:	1904 Seth Thomas Serial List
Database Version:	v52.428
Advanced Metrics
PWDB Absolute Rarity Index: Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration	43.35
PWDB Relative Rarity Index: Rarity within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration	263.30
Share of Production: Share within Manufacturer - Scoped for Grade/Size/Model/Configuration	2.816%
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only	8 (0.27%)

Value Guide

What is My Watch Worth?

Have a Question?

Ask the experts in The Pocket Watch Group

Production Metrics Tree: Grade 106

Target Profile: 18S-M6-11J-OTL-U

Seth Thomas Grade 106 (All Variations): 16,200 ETP
18S: 16,200 100.00% 18s, Grade 106
18S-M6: 14,400 88.89% 18s, Grade 106, Model 6	Other: 1,800 Other Models or Unclassified
18S-M6-11J: 14,400 88.89% 18s, Grade 106, Model 6, 11 Jewels
18S-M6-11J-OTL: 14,400 88.89% 18s, Grade 106, Model 6, 11 Jewels, Openface/Lever/Two-Tone
18S-M6-11J-OTL-U: 14,400 88.89%

Population Registry for This Run

	Image	Serial Number	Run Position	Primary Identification Method	Discovery Date
There are 8 watches in the population registry for this run with 5 images. Create a FREE account or login to view the population registry and add your watch to the registry. Create a Free Account

Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:

Does this information describe your movement accurately?

Yes

Why Might This Information Be Incorrect?

Verification Reports for this Run

The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.

SethThomasFan Top Contributor Seth Thomas Expert Supporter 386 · March 29, 2024

Serial Number 605313 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Grade: 36
Jewels: 7j
Movement Finish: Nickel
Movement Setting: Pin
Hairspring: Flat

This is the 1896 Version of Companion

cbzimm Supporter 469 · June 6, 2023

Serial Number 606133 was reported as accurate.

SethThomasFan Top Contributor Seth Thomas Expert Supporter 386 · December 14, 2022

Serial Number 604869 was reported as accurate.

SethThomasFan Top Contributor Seth Thomas Expert Supporter 386 · December 14, 2022

Serial Number 604869 was reported as inaccurate.

Note: Movement Markings:
Montgomery Ward
Chicago
20th Century
Safety Pinion

Curator Response: Thanks for the report. In a run of standard movements with private labels, the "movement markings" are reflected as the standard marking with the implied understanding that private label markings would be different. Thanks to contributing images of your watch to illustrate this for other researchers.