Pocket Watch Database
https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/ball-record/433
Access Date: November 10, 2024
"433" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
From the American Horology Archive:
Ball - Record
Grade: 435
Manufactured by Swiss (Record), Ball Company
Manufacturer: | Ball - Record | |
Movement Serial Number: | 433 | |
Grade: | 435 | |
Model: | B | |
Estimated Production Year: | 1960 | |
Size: | 16s | |
Jewels: | 17j | |
Movement Configuration: | Openface | |
Movement Finish: | Nickel | |
Movement Setting: | Lever | |
Adjusted: | No | |
Railroad Grade: | No | |
Case: | Various | |
Database Version: | v52.431 | |
Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only | 2 (0.40%) | |
Research Note: Some Marked "Unadjusted."
|
Population Registry for This Run
Image | Serial Number | Run Position | Primary Identification Method | Discovery Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are 2 watches in the population registry for this run with 1 image.
|
Help Us Help Others By Improving the Database:
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been graciously submitted by dedicated members in reference to this production run. These reports are useful to verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research. Please note that reports may contain inaccurate information or assumptions that must be dilligently considered with other available sources.
Anonymous · July 27, 2023
Serial Number 435 was reported as inaccurate.
also
Anonymous · March 10, 2023
Serial Number 435 was reported as inaccurate.
have is pendant-set, and actually states
"unadjusted"--I've never seen that before!
Bob Cassara
Birminghamcoin Supporter 8 · June 20, 2022
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Birminghamcoin Supporter 8 · June 20, 2022
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 25, 2021
Serial Number 433 was reported as inaccurate.
dholmes Supporter 27 · January 15, 2021
Serial Number 433 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 18, 2020
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 19, 2020
Serial Number 435 was reported as inaccurate.
#435 watch in my hands. *****@aol.com]
Anonymous · May 12, 2019
Serial Number 170 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 12, 2019
Serial Number 170 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 12, 2019
Serial Number 170 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 12, 2018
Serial Number 433 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 28, 2018
Serial Number 433 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 25, 2017
Serial Number 323 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 6, 2017
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 21, 2015
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 30, 2015
Serial Number 435 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · April 27, 2015
Serial Number 177 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · December 11, 2014
Serial Number 498 was reported as inaccurate.
annienurse 1 · October 10, 2014
Serial Number 25 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · June 16, 2014
Serial Number 116 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · February 16, 2014
Serial Number 30 was reported as inaccurate.
Anonymous · December 27, 2013
Serial Number 38 was reported as inaccurate.
stamped on same cover.only other markings visible
swiss made.
Anonymous · August 14, 2013
Serial Number 0276 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 8, 2013
Serial Number 0109 was reported as inaccurate.
suffix). It seems that 0001 to 0500 are grade No.
435
txtimefan Supporter 101 · June 22, 2013
Serial Number 0278 was reported as accurate.